One of the biggest differences I've encountered since returning back to Scotland, is the prevalence of "stealthy" operating. Yet in Boston, Silicon Valley and indeed Cambridge, UK., everything is much more out in the open as entrepreneurs discuss ideas, reach out for help and scramble for resources to get their ideas off the ground.
Every time I hear about a new startup that is in so called "stealth mode", I wonder what problem they are hiding from whom. Of course they pretend that they are trying to avoid alerting competitors prior to launch, but too often it becomes an excuse to move slowly in a world that’s all about getting to market fast. Openness is part of the business culture of entrepreneurs. People talk to people, and even competitors freely exchange news on trends and discoveries. So taking some pointers from Martin Zwillig (@startuppro) over at Start-up Professionals, here are some of the things which could actually help startup efforts, rather than hurt them:
To enforce stealthy behavior, startups often require everyone, even potential employees to sign nondisclosure agreements, and strictly control who may speak with the media. This is a turnoff to everyone, and real investors never sign nondisclosures. It’s all an expensive distraction that doesn’t work.
Overall, I recognize that there are some startups, like biotech and semiconductors, with long highly technical development cycles and huge competitors, where early stealth makes sense. But with many others, incubation time must be short, and secrecy can be the kiss of death. For too many startups, stealth is much ado about nothing.
So my early-stage motto is "stealth mode is for fighter-jets - not-start-ups." But what do you think..?